Asian Americans Advancing Justice - LA

This is an archive. View the new site here.


Civil Rights Groups File Briefs Opposing Anti-Immigrant Law

Apr 12 2012

India West

More than 100 civil rights organizations, members of Congress, and former immigration officials last month sent 22 amicus briefs to the U.S. Supreme Court opposing Arizona’s controversial SB 1070 legislation, one of the nation’s harshest anti-immigrant measures.

Read more »

Trinity Law Associates Suit

APALC represents a group of 28 Korean immigrant homeowners against in a lawsuit against Trinity Law Associates, a law office that falsely advertised that homeowners could prevent foreclosure and reduce mortgage debt by hiring Trinity for "loan litigation" services. The lawsuit alleges that Trinity targeted Korean immigrant homeowners at risk of foreclosure and charged thousands of dollars for services and benefits that Trinity never provided, causing many homeowners to actually lose their homes.

Equal Marriage Rights

APALC is co-counsel on and helps organize a coalition of 63 local, state, and national Asian American organizations to endorse an amicus brief in support of equal marriage rights for gay and lesbian couples. The brief filed with the California Supreme Court highlights the shared history of marriage discrimination between Asian immigrants and gay and lesbian couples. 

Kim v. Shin

Kim v Shin: APALC represents four Koreatown tenants who endured uninhabitable living conditions in their apartments, while required to pay full rent, as their landlords began a condominium conversion that turned their units into construction zones. When the tenants filed complaints with the city, the landlords retaliated by illegally raising the rent. In July 2008, a jury decided in favor of the tenants, finding that tenants have a right to live in healthy and safe homes and to be free of abusive landlords, and giving the tenants a judgment of over $572,000.

Gonzalez v. Abercrombie & Fitch

Gonzalez v Abercrombie & Fitch: APALC is part of the legal team that sues Abercrombie & Fitch, charging that the hiring and employment practices at one of the nation’s largest clothing retailers discriminate against Asian American, Latino, and African American applicants and employees. The class action lawsuit settles in November 2004, with a significant payment to Asian American, Latino, and African American employees and applicants as well as changes in the company’s operations and marketing practices. 

Fashion 21 v. Garment Worker Center

Fashion 21 v. Garment Worker Center: During the workers’ rights litigation against Forever 21, the owners of Forever 21 file a lawsuit for defamation and libel against their 19 former workers, advocacy groups and the staff of these organizations. The company alleges defamation for pickets and leaflets that called on Forever 21 to take responsibility for sweatshop conditions in which their clothes are made. APALC initially represents the workers in this case, but after the workers are dropped, APALC joins co-counsel for the organizations.



Our helplines prioritize assistance to low-income persons in the following areas of law: discrimination, family, immigration, public benefits, employment, housing, and civil rights. 

English: 888.349.9695
中文: 800.520.2356
한글: 800.867.3640
Tagalog: 855.300.2552
ภาษาไทย: 800.914.9583
Tiếng Việt: 714.477.2958


Our mission is to advocate for civil rights, provide legal services and education, and build coalitions to positively influence and impact Asian Americans, Native Hawaiians, and Pacific Islanders and to create a more equitable and harmonious society.